Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Trustee Areas topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District holds first pre-map public hearing ahead of trustee-area maps required under California law
Summary
Attorney Jonathan Salt told the board that the district must hold pre-map hearings under the California Elections Code and explained the California Voting Rights Act's risk to at-large systems; the demographer will use 2020 Census totals to target roughly 2,900 people per trustee area and will post draft maps for public review in February with a March 27 adoption vote targeted.
The board convened the first of two required pre-map public hearings on converting the district's at-large elections to trustee-area elections, with Jonathan Salt of F3 Law leading the legal overview. Salt told the board that under the California Voting Rights Act, plaintiffs do not need to prove discriminatory intent to challenge at-large systems, and that many districts transition to trustee areas to avoid litigation and attorney fees. He said the demographer will prioritize total population using 2020 Census counts and then consider citizen voting-age population figures, contiguity and communities of interest when drawing maps.
Salt said the district's 2020 population was "a little less than 14,500" and that each trustee area would target roughly 2,900 people. He outlined the process (another pre-map hearing next week, demographer drafting 3–4 draft map options, three map public hearings, and a final board vote likely on March 27), and answered questions about vacancies, appointments and hybrid-election schemes. Community members asked whether trustee areas would be more or less democratic in local practice; Salt warned that a hybrid mix of area and at-large seats is treated as at-large under the election code and would not provide the safe harbor from CVRA litigation.
