Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Temporary Signs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents split over sandwich boards and feather flags as planners propose limits
Summary
Commissioners and residents debated whether A-frame (sandwich) signs and feather flags should be limited or banned to preserve village character; some called them essential for business promotion while others said they create visual clutter and safety issues.
Discussion of temporary signs consumed a sizeable part of the meeting. Resident-witnesses raised concerns that sandwich boards and feather flags change the character of the historic village and can clutter sidewalks or distract drivers, while business representatives said those signs meet a real need for flexible, event-driven promotion.
Wendy Marinan (Speaker 1) said she supported preserving the town's visual character and recommended including "integrity" in the design-review language. "Integrity is a helpful term that allows people to understand the difference when they're making changes," she said, adding that movable sandwich boards are hard to control and can produce visual clutter.
Other members argued sandwich boards fill a functional gap for businesses with daily or dynamic offerings, and cautioned against a blanket ban without offering alternative promotion tools. Commissioners discussed limiting A-frame signs to 8 square feet per side and including time limits for event-style temporary signs; they also noted the draft includes exemptions and potential conditional-review options to handle special cases.
