Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Reuse topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council agrees to staff negotiation for privately funded duckweed wastewater pilot

Hutto City Council · April 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A local developer proposed a privately funded, 12‑month pilot using duckweed in greenhouse cells to polish up to 20,000 gpd of treated effluent; council directed staff to negotiate terms (escrowed decommission funds, independent lab verification) and return a formal agreement for council approval.

A private developer and consultant asked the Hutto City Council to allow a 12‑month, privately funded pilot that would test a greenhouse-based duckweed treatment to polish municipal effluent to Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Type 1 reclaimed-water standards.

Michael Martinez, the presenting developer, said the system would operate on about one‑third of an adjacent parcel and treat roughly 20,000 gallons per day, about 2% of the plant's capacity. "Every drop that enters the system returns the same permitted discharge pathway already in use today," Martinez said, emphasizing that the proposal would not create a new discharge route or require changes to plant operations. He added that investors would pre-fund site restoration and equipment removal so the city would bear no decommissioning cost.

Paul Skillicorn, the technical lead, described a three‑stage greenhouse process (two nutrient-removal stages using duckweed plus a polishing greenhouse) with third‑party lab verification. Councilmembers pressed on noise, duckweed containment and data access; the presenters said acoustic shielding would be included, the duckweed would be contained and weekly publicly available reports with raw data would be supplied.

Council did not execute a final agreement but voted unanimously to direct staff to negotiate a site‑use agreement incorporating city legal review, escrowed decommissioning funds and that the city would receive all performance data; the final agreement must return to council for approval.