Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hays County rejects Hays Commons development agreement after weeks of public opposition
Summary
After hours of public testimony and written comments opposing the Hays Commons plan because of groundwater and wastewater concerns, the commissioners voted to deny the developer’s proposed agreement; proponents and opponents had argued over OSSF permits and spray‑field impacts.
Dozens of residents turned out and 73 written commenters also weighed in on agenda item K13 — a development agreement from Hays Commons Land Investment LP — pressing the commissioners to reject the plan for hundreds of homes over sensitive recharge areas.
Speakers at the public hearing said the site sits above Edwards and Trinity aquifers and that the developer’s Texas Land Application Permit (TLAP) plan to spray treated effluent raises water‑quality and recharge concerns. Javier Fonseca told the court: “You cannot build a future in a place you destroy,” and Carson Gilchrist for Save Our Springs Alliance argued the applicant “fails all four required showings” for the variance the project seeks. Commissioners debated whether a variance or a development agreement offers the county more leverage; after extended discussion and legal review the court denied the specific Hays Commons development agreement on roll call.
