Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Curriculum Adoption topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District reviews two ELA curriculum options, highlights 'science of reading' and training plan

Meade School District 46-1 Board of Education · February 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Curriculum director Beth Johnson presented two ELA curriculum finalists aligned to the science of reading — Magnetic Literacy (approx. $417,020.40 over six years) and Amplify (initial quote ~ $4.47M, vendor negotiating) — and outlined training, piloting and grant support.

Curriculum director Beth Johnson told the board the district prioritized alignment with the state’s literacy framework and the science of reading as it evaluated three pilot curricula and narrowed to two finalists.

Johnson said the district’s literacy committee used rubrics from nonprofit reviewers and its own needs assessment. “We piloted three separate curriculum, and [Magnetic Literacy] came in at $417,020.40 for a six-year package,” she said, noting that Amplify initially submitted a higher price and that the vendor was negotiating to be more competitive. Johnson emphasized the difference in approaches: Magnetic Literacy emphasizes inquiry and discussion, while Amplify is “knowledge-driven literacy” that embeds content-area material into ELA lessons.

Johnson described training already underway (a three-hour science-of-reading crash course delivered districtwide in October) and a literacy grant partnership with Black Hills State University that will support implementation and professional learning over multiple years. She said student digital licenses, consumable decodable texts and teacher digital resources would be provided by either vendor, and that the board would see a final adoption recommendation next month to allow materials to be available for a March in-service.

Board members asked about time for teacher onboarding; Johnson said the grant and vendor supports will cover much of the initial professional development and that middle- and high-school teachers will require additional supports in later years. The board did not take action; Johnson will return with final pricing and pilot results.