Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fiscal Analysis topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
IDA consultant says project costs rose sharply; financial analysis shows modest net public benefit and school impacts
Summary
Grow America told the IDA the 277 North Avenue project’s cost has risen by tens of millions since 2018, the approved PILOT produces a front-loaded abatement and the net public-benefit analysis estimates additional tax increment and fees while projecting about 18 net new students from the development.
Get email alerts on the Fiscal Analysis topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During the March 11 meeting the IDA’s consultant, Grow America, reviewed the project’s cost-benefit analysis and said that economic conditions since 2018 have materially changed the project’s economics. Kevin Grams told the board the development budget is now roughly $250 million and that project costs have increased by about $50–70 million compared with earlier estimates; at one point he stated, “I was reminded that, the increase of the project cost is $70,000,000.”
Grams explained the proposed PILOT follows the same schedule authorized in 2018 with a deviation (a front-loaded abatement of 75% in years 1–2 then a phase-in) and said the analysis shows an average incremental tax increase of roughly $1.2 million per year over the 20-year schedule. He reported the development package totals were in the tens of millions (Grow America cited roughly $29,000,000 of IDA-related tax savings and attributed $43,000,000 of public-benefit value in fees and other measures across the 20-year period in the analysis presented to the board).
On schools, Grow America estimated the unit mix (mostly studios and one-bedrooms) would generate about 18 net new students; staff noted there is a five-year look-back and reconciliation process that allows the school district to request an audit and make a case for underpayment if appropriate. Board members asked for updated per-pupil cost inputs and for staff to coordinate directly with the school district to validate student-generation assumptions.
