Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Health topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Veterinarians tell committee expanded lay pregnancy checking could undermine disease surveillance
Summary
State veterinarians and the Board of Veterinary Medicine warned the committee that removing on‑site veterinary involvement for pregnancy examinations could reduce disease surveillance and harm recruitment of large‑animal veterinarians.
Dr. Hazel, testifying for the Wyoming Livestock Board, emphasized that "pregnancy examination of bovine is a medical diagnosis" and warned that a statutory change allowing uncertified lay practice could impair the Livestock Board’s disease surveillance, control and eradication work. He said veterinarians conducting on‑site examinations collect critical herd‑level health information and that the fall pregnancy season is a key time for surveillance and establishing a veterinary‑client‑patient relationship for prescribing herd medications.
Dr. Ben Osborn (Board of Veterinary Medicine, private practitioner) told the committee the board is opposed to the draft legislation as written because oversight and checks on lay palpators would be burdensome and because certifying veterinarians could face liability when attesting to applicants’ competence. Osborn described clinical practice standards (digital recordkeeping, body‑condition scoring, staged pregnancy recording) and said pregnancy examinations constitute a significant share of fall practice revenue that underwrites other veterinary services. "We do a little bit of work up in Sublette County as well... we preg check somewhere between 30,000 and 40,000 head each fall," Osborn said, describing the scale of clinic activity.
