Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Eviction Prevention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears options to use roughly $100,000 for eviction prevention and to prioritize grants after state cuts
Summary
Staff briefed council on sharp state cuts to eviction-prevention funding and local options to use leftover intergovernmental funds (Tualatins share ~ $100,000) to support eviction prevention, plus adjustments to the citys outside agency grant program.
Get email alerts on the Eviction Prevention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff updated the council on local eviction-prevention capacity and grant options following major state cuts. Megan Cohen said the state made large reductions to eviction-prevention programs (quoted in the presentation as a 75% cut representing about $129 million in June 2025). Cohen and Nicole Morris reviewed local supports, program costs and the citys outside agency grant program options.
Cohen presented regional eviction data from a public dashboard and noted that roughly 4,800 evictions were filed in the last 12 months in the tri-county area; she said most filings (about 95%) were for nonpayment and that representation rates differ between tenants and landlords. Local providers named in the discussion included Just Compassion (which operates a housing-related social needs program), Family Promise (which provides rent-assistance support with an average assistance amount of about $4,500 per household), and Community Action (which administers utility-assistance funds under contract). Cohen said Tualatin contracts with Community Action for a water-bill assistance program, paying $7,800 in administrative costs and expending roughly $7,500 this fiscal year in assistance.
Nicole Morris described the outside agency grant program, which began in 2014 at $24,000 and has grown to $50,000. In the prior fiscal year 19 partner agencies received awards between $1,000 and $5,000. Staff presented options for council direction: keep the program unchanged; maintain funding but add criteria prioritizing eviction-prevention applications; increase the overall funding level and use the increase for eviction prevention; or pursue eviction-prevention approaches outside the outside-agency program.
Councilors discussed administrative overhead and program design. Councilor Hillier raised concerns about the proportion of funds going to administrative costs for utility-assistance contracts and urged a balance of upstream prevention and downstream supports. Several councilors suggested earmarking the roughly $100,000 in leftover funds (Tualatins proposed share from the three-city split) as a multiyear eviction-prevention resource to get measurable results and to keep the broader outside-agency grant program available for other community services. Staff said they will bring more details about administration, potential providers (Family Promise identified as a likely local administrator), guidelines and outreach plans for how such funds could be deployed.

