Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bylaws, ex parte rules and ethics language updated; water-tank patent and utility overlay to return at public hearing
Summary
Commissioners reviewed proposed bylaws edits, debated ex parte disclosures and 'impermissible bias' language borrowed from state law, and scheduled an Aug. 3 public hearing to revisit a major utility overlay and a BLM land-patent question related to a proposed water tank.
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The commission walked through proposed bylaws changes that update meeting procedures, special meetings, pre-application conferences and ex parte communication rules. Several members favored clearer language to avoid ambiguous 'includes' lists and to set predictable expectations for applicants and the public.
S1 (Committee member) proposed removing the phrase "regarding any business before the commission" from the ex parte restriction to clarify what must be disclosed, and other members supported seeking legal review. The commission also reviewed new state-law language on "impermissible bias" that identifies prejudgment and financial conflicts as removable causes; members asked counsel to provide a plain-language memo before final adoption. Andrew (staff) said the draft will be sent to county counsel for review.
Separately, the commission resumed discussion of a proposed major-utility overlay and a land patent tied to a proposed water tank site. Staff reported that county counsel and the city are being asked to verify whether the patent limits the parcel to public uses (e.g., cemetery/public infrastructure). Commissioners asked that the city and legal counsel attend the Aug. 3 public hearing to address patent language, development agreements, and the overlay's legal description.

