Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fire Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Court tables request to use Bureau Veritas for third‑party fire plan reviews pending more detail
Summary
County staff asked to outsource fire sprinkler plan reviews and some inspections to third‑party firm Bureau Veritas because county staff lack certified plan‑review personnel. Commissioners asked for clear criteria, cost impacts on contractors, and technical clarifications; staff said the vendor charges construction firms, and the item was tabled pending a company representative’s return.
County staff requested that the court authorize using Bureau Veritas to perform fire sprinkler plan reviews and limited inspections for new construction, citing limited in‑house certified personnel. "By going 3rd party, the company actually charges the construction company that's building the buildings," staff member Randy said, adding, "so there's no charge to the county at all for them to come do those inspections and to do the plan reviews." Commissioners pressed for specifics on when third‑party review would be triggered and whether this represents a policy change. One commissioner asked whether the requirement applies to buildings above a certain square footage; staff clarified the county has been informally accepting plan reviews but lacks certification and that the threshold discussed was buildings that require sprinkler systems (discussed as above roughly 12,000 square feet during the hearing).
Commissioners sought a written description of the triggering criteria, the types of structures covered, and any expected cost impacts on school districts or developers. Randy agreed to provide detailed data and invited Bureau Veritas to return to answer technical questions. The court elected to table final action and asked staff to schedule a Bureau Veritas representative to appear at a future meeting so commissioners could review vendor scope and fee information before deciding.
