Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council told it cannot simply reject Mill Creek proposal; land-use rules and LUBA could limit local action
Summary
Staff and council discussed that land-use decisions are semi-judicial: Salem cannot deny a compliant proposal for dislike alone and LUBA appeals could reverse improper denials. Rule changes take at least 35 days but usually several months.
City staff and the council explained at the July 27 meeting that Salem's land-use process is semi-judicial and that the council cannot simply refuse a proposal because it dislikes it; instead, the council must find a current regulation the proposal does not meet to deny it. Ash summarized the point: “land use is semi judicial. So the council can't just say no to a proposal because they don't like it. They have to find a current existing regulation that the proposal does not meet.”
Ash also flagged procedural timing: a rule change requires a 35-day minimum but in practice takes three to six months, and if the council denies a compliant proposal without a stated regulatory basis, the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) could reverse the decision. These procedural constraints were cited by the council as reasons to pursue policy drafting through a task force rather than immediate ad hoc refusals.
