Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the County Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners confront budget shortfall after certified values fall; staff models 3¢ tax‑rate option

McLennan County Commissioners Court · July 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

With recent certified taxable values lower than projections, staff reported FY27 revenues down and a projected fund balance near $31.8M (19.4%); staff modeled a 3¢ tax‑rate increase scenario and commissioners asked for alternate cuts and phased rate approaches before adopting a proposed rate.

Frances, the county budget lead, told the court she received updated certified values that reduced projected taxable value and cut the county’s revenue outlook. Based on the latest numbers and the court’s consensus cuts, the FY27 fund balance was projected at about $31.8 million, or roughly 19.4% of operating expenditures. Frances said the county’s expenditures for the working budget scenario were approximately $166.7 million.

Staff ran a scenario that adds a 3¢ increase to the tax rate (bringing the working rate to about 3.64085) and, with an embedded assumption that departments on average will come in 3% under budget, the 3¢ scenario brought the projected fund‑balance percentage close to the court’s 25% target (within roughly $500,000 in the staff model). Commissioners asked staff to prepare additional scenarios before the court sets a proposed rate: (1) quantify savings from removing or deferring furniture/equipment lines, (2) the effect of a 1% across‑the‑board reduction in operating expenditures, and (3) a phased approach (for example 1.5¢ one year and 1.5¢ the next) to reach the equivalent 3¢ in a staggered way. Several commissioners stressed the difficulty of absorbing further revenue hits from state actions and the risks of deferring maintenance and operating costs into future years.

Frances emphasized the biggest variable was the taxable value change and asked whether the court wanted staff to proceed with the 3¢ scenario for the proposed rate or to further tighten expenditures. Commissioners directed staff to return with the requested alternative scenarios and specifics on household impact figures.