Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Solar Farm topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves agreements so Tallgrass can reimburse county legal and technical review for proposed solar farm

Ellis County Commission · February 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Ellis County approved agreements allowing the proposed Tallgrass solar development (IBV/Tallgrass) to place funds in escrow to reimburse county legal and technical review by Foulston and AcreStrong; staff emphasized the contracts do not commit the county to approve future permits or pilot payments and capped reimbursements at $110,000 unless parties agree otherwise.

The Ellis County Commission approved three linked agreements that let IBV/Tallgrass Development reimburse the county for legal and technical review of a proposed solar project. The package includes an escrow/reimbursement agreement with the developer, an engagement with the law firm Foulston for legal review, and a contract with AcreStrong for independent technical analysis of solar-specific issues.

Darren Myers told commissioners the reimbursements would cover costs the county would not otherwise incur and said the arrangement "does not commit Ellis County to proceed" with conditional-use permits or payments in lieu of taxes. Myers also said the reimbursement cap is set at up to $110,000 and that work would stop if negotiations required expenditures beyond that cap without further approval.

Steve Link of Tallgrass Development addressed questions about lease terms and decommissioning, saying long-term leases generally require the project to cover any zoning-related changes and that landowners retain title. "In our long term lease agreements, we do stipulate that if there's any change in zoning on a solar agreement, the project would be on the hook, would pay that, so that landowners can keep the land at their name," Link said. Commissioners discussed vendor name similarities and due diligence by counsel and then approved the agreements; staff noted that the agreements are intended to protect the county and to ensure the county does not expend its own funds on specialist review.