Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Roads topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Jackson County awards $289,500 chip-and-seal contract to Pavecraft

Jackson County Board of County Commissioners · March 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Jackson County Board of County Commissioners approved a $289,500 contract with Pavecraft to chip-and-seal roughly nine miles of county roads after rejecting a bidder for insufficient specifications; vote 3–0.

The Jackson County Board of County Commissioners voted to award a chip-and-seal contract to Pavecraft for $289,500 to overlay approximately nine miles of county road, a move commissioners said aims to preserve surface conditions on several segments.

Road and Bridge Director Scott Kieffaber presented three bids for the project: Vance Brothers ($270,000), Approved Paving LLC ($331,230) and Pavecraft ($289,500). The board determined the Vance Brothers submission lacked necessary specifications and was not sufficient to consider. Commissioner Keith Kelly moved to accept Pavecraft’s $289,500 bid; Commissioner Linda Gerhardt seconded and the motion carried 3–0.

Kieffaber described the scope as an overlay on Q4 from 234 to 286 and 214 from P to R5 and said bidders received the same specification sheet. He also noted field work including right-of-way checks for a landowner’s fence project on Spring (222) Road and inventory changes at the bridge yard to address discrepancies. Kieffaber reported ongoing work to elevate a short stretch of W Road and said patching on recently chip-sealed roads would begin in a couple of weeks. The board did not record additional conditions on the contract award at the meeting.

Chairman Mark Pruett relayed a remark from a town-hall attendee, saying that after driving county roads in neighboring states the resident opined, “the people of Jackson County don’t know how good they have it,” a comment commissioners cited as context for maintenance priorities.

The board’s formal approval was recorded as a 3–0 vote. No timeline for contractor mobilization was provided during the meeting.