Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Select Board reviews state model ethics policy and a proposed local enforcement process; members debate recusal and whistleblower provisions
Summary
The board appointed an ethics liaison, reviewed a draft enforcement process and forms, and debated whether perceived conflicts should be handled locally or referred to the state; the board also discussed a whistleblower protection form and where to post materials.
Moderator (S5) said the town had registered an ethics liaison with the state and circulated the Municipal Code of Ethics materials and sample state and municipal policies. Presenter (S7), who drafted a proposed process for investigation and enforcement, told the board: "It's the process for investigation and enforcement of the ethical violations," and distributed draft forms and a flow sheet to clarify conflict-of-interest procedures.
Board members debated scope and deference to state experts. Some members argued that perceived conflicts should be sent to the state for review and guidance before local action; others said the town could adopt more stringent local rules. Presenter (S7) noted the state materials recommend leaving a member out of deliberation and that "it is highly recommended that that person leave the room in the deliberation prior to the vote." Moderator (S5) and others agreed to consolidate suggested text and circulate a final draft for the next meeting; the board also discussed whether whistleblower protections and associated forms should be posted on the town website.
