Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Earth Extraction topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Select Board, planners debate enforceable standards for earth extraction and limits of local air‑pollution monitoring
Summary
Planning commissioners proposed a tiered approach to regulate earth extraction (gravel/quarry) based on project intensity; town attorney said zoning can adopt performance standards but complex air‑pollutant monitoring and ongoing post‑construction monitoring are practically and legally limited.
The Select Board and Planning Commission discussed a tiered regulatory framework for earth extraction that would scale review and conditions by project intensity and off‑site sale of material.
Tyler (town planner/zoning administrator) described a tiered system of regulation that would trigger stricter standards for larger operations and emphasized that any bylaw must be administrable by staff: "Anything that we put in the bylaw has to be I have to ultimately be able to enforce or be able to have some way to document." He added that tier thresholds might be framed around the amount of material moved or daily water usage.
Town Attorney Dave Rue explained legal limits on what zoning can require and the practical difficulty of municipal air‑pollution monitoring: "Municipalities Vermont is what's known as a Dillon's rule state... The town only has those powers that have been written into the law and given to them by the legislature." He said towns can adopt performance standards (noise, dust limits) but that technical monitoring for some pollutants often requires expert equipment and state involvement.
A lengthy letter from Jerry Throne (read into the record) argued the town could establish a local air‑pollution control program and commission independent monitoring for Tier 2/3 sites. The letter's claim—that the town can establish and administer a local air‑pollution control program—was disputed by the town attorney who said such ordinances are legally distinct from zoning and rarely adopted in practice because of monitoring costs and technical complexity.
Planning commissioners said they will refine the tiered model to remove provisions that would be impractical to enforce and return with clarified draft language; the board encouraged coordination with state agencies for any monitoring or technical work.
