Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Administration proposes ordinance to standardize naming of city property; council debates school committee authority
Summary
The mayor’s office introduced a proposed ordinance to establish consistent rules for naming city property; councilors and solicitor’s office discussed alignment with school committee rules and Massachusetts General Laws chapter 43, section 33, and debated whether a home‑rule petition is needed to include school properties.
A representative from the mayor’s office presented a proposed ordinance intended to standardize the process for naming city buildings and other city‑owned property to ensure consistency with school practices and historical accuracy. The solicitor’s office explained the intent is not to replace the school committee’s existing rules but to have a consistent city policy.
Councilors asked why the ordinance is being proposed now, whether it should mirror the school committee’s differing waiting periods after a person’s death (five vs. ten years), and whether the council should pursue a home‑rule petition to include school property naming. The solicitor’s office cited Massachusetts General Laws, chapter 43, section 33 in discussing the school committee’s jurisdiction and said the office is researching prior opinions to clarify authority and suggested language changes could be made later in the drafting process.
Councilors expressed mixed views: some supported removing a fixed waiting period entirely, others preferred a shorter window; several said the city and school committee should collaborate on naming decisions for school property. The item was left for further research and subcommittee consideration.
