Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Energy Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Tinmouth planners push back on ambitious renewable targets and question siting guidance

Tinmouth Planning Commission · January 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Tinmouth Planning Commission reviewed the draft energy section of the town plan and debated aggressive numeric targets, the provenance of regional survey results, and whether local maps and bylaws already address renewable siting.

The Tinmouth Planning Commission spent much of its Jan. 16 meeting revising the draft energy policies and questioning numeric targets and siting actions recommended in the regional plan. Chair (S3) told members the draft includes high-level goals and maps but the commission should confirm the evidence behind claimed survey results before adopting firm town language.

"I don't remember a survey," Chair (S3) said as members asked for the original outreach data and dates. Several members asked Jeremy, the regional planner who was absent, to supply the survey materials so the commission can verify what respondents were asked and when.—a request the commission placed on its question list for him.

Members debated whether the town should adopt the plan's siting questionnaire and two related actions (Action 2 and 3). Committee member (S1) said the town already has maps that constrain potential solar sites—current-use land, conserved parcels and agricultural lands—and argued that the proposed questionnaire and extra guidance are redundant. "We already decided where all these things are," Committee member (S1) said, urging the commission to strike the duplicative items.

At the same time, several members noted the plan lists numeric thermal and water-heater targets the town would find difficult to reach without funding or mandates. Committee member (S5) read figures in the draft and compared them to present local counts: the draft aims for 216 weatherized buildings by 2050 and 257 heat-pump water heaters, while the commission records show roughly six weatherized municipal buildings and 28 heat-pump water heaters today. "I wouldn't be comfortable mandating a requirement that adds cost to a homeowner," Chair (S3) said, emphasizing the difference between encouraging adoption and imposing local mandates.

The commission agreed to wait for Jeremy's review of their edits on the last two pages and to request the original survey documentation before making final decisions on siting actions and numeric targets.