Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Amendment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Board opens hearing on bylaw to regulate small clean energy facilities

Westford Planning Board · July 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Westford Planning Board opened a public hearing on PB 2612, a proposed zoning bylaw adding Section 6.6 to govern small clean energy infrastructure (solar and battery storage). MCOG explained the state’s consolidated permitting timeline and the board and public raised questions on setbacks, by-right allowances, noise and emergency planning.

The Westford Planning Board opened a public hearing on PB 2612, a proposed amendment to the zoning bylaw that would create Section 6.6 to govern small clean energy infrastructure facilities, including solar and battery energy storage systems. Chair called the hearing, motions to waive the reading and to open the public hearing were approved by voice vote.

Kelly Lynamo, deputy director at MCOG, told the board the state’s 225 CMR 29 framework requires a consolidated municipal permitting process and establishes a 12-month review window after completeness is determined. “The law basically requires it's procedural. It's more about the process by which something is reviewed, not the legal language of the zoning,” Lynamo said, outlining the 30-day completeness check and the potential for constructive approval if the town does not issue a final decision within 12 months.

The draft creates a distinct Section 6.6 to address battery electric storage systems and solar, recommends site-suitability screening and sets review thresholds so some projects would be allowed by-right while others would require site plan review or a special permit depending on size and whether the use is accessory or principal. Board members and members of the public asked the board to clarify which districts would allow by-right development, and whether larger facilities should instead require a special permit.

The hearing was continued to the board’s next meeting at 7 p.m. on August 17 to allow staff to revise the draft incorporating the comments and to prepare district-specific tables and additional clarifying language.