Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mandatory Reporting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board discussion clarifies reporting duties: school investigation, law enforcement and DPI oversight
Summary
Board members pressed staff to clarify when to report suspicions and how allegations are handled across school, law enforcement and DPI channels; counsel said mandatory reporting is unchanged and that all three tracks may run concurrently.
Board members at the July 27 special meeting pressed the district's legal team for plain-language guidance on when staff must report suspected inappropriate conduct and how investigations proceed. General Counsel Aka said mandatory reporting obligations do not change under the draft policy and that "there's really three reporting tracks included in this policy": the act 57 parent-notification requirement, mandated reporting to child-protection or law enforcement depending on allegations, and DPI's educator-misconduct review.
Aka told the board that staff should report suspicious conduct even if they are unsure whether it meets the statutory definition. "If they're suspicious, they should report," she said, adding that a preliminary credible‑report determination under act 57 triggers tight notification timelines. Board members asked staff to clarify the difference between suspicion and a statutory threshold (Wis. Stat. 118.076 was cited during the discussion) and to make reporting guidance more user-friendly so staff are not deterred from reporting. The board directed staff to revise the policy text to make reporting steps and responsible offices clearer and to return the revised wording to the policy committee.
