Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Landmark Map Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ruston planning commission opens discussion, Chair moves to recommend denial of TerraCotta landmark map amendment
Summary
After a TerraCotta presentation and extensive public testimony about contaminated soil and view impacts at Point Ruston Lot 15, Chair Kevin Moser moved that the Planning Commission recommend denial of the Comprehensive Plan map amendment to designate portions of Lot 15 as Landmark Opportunity Sites. The motion was seconded and opened for discussion; a final vote is not recorded in the minutes provided.
Chair Kevin Moser opened the commission’s review of TerraCotta’s request to add portions of Lot 15 at Point Ruston to the Comprehensive Plan’s Landmark Opportunity Sites Map and emphasized that the Commission’s action would be a policy-level recommendation, not an approval of any development or site-wide height increase.
On the motion tabled for discussion, Chair Moser moved “that the Planning Commission recommend denial of the proposed amendment to the Ruston Comprehensive Plan Landmark Opportunity Sites Map, based on the determination the redevelopment of the site should continue to be governed by the existing Point Ruston Master Development Plan Framework.” The motion was seconded by Commissioner Cliff Kendall and opened for deliberation. The minutes record robust public opposition centered on height increases and soil remediation. As Chair Moser summarized, “The primary concern expressed by the public was the requested increase in building height to maximize development potential and profits, which most correspondents opposed.”
Commissioners debated whether Lot 15 meets the Comprehensive Plan’s criteria for a landmark-quality location. Commissioner Mark Shingledecker argued the visual impact would be minimal and said he would vote in favor, while Commissioners Stu Lehr, Talia Tepvongsa and Cliff Kendall emphasized strict application of adopted standards and remediation concerns. The minutes do not include a recorded final vote on the motion in the excerpt provided.
What happens next: because the Commission’s role is a policy recommendation, any change to the Comprehensive Plan would still require City Council action and subsequent code and permitting reviews. The staff report reiterated that approval of a map amendment would not itself modify base zoning heights or grant development entitlements.
