Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Battery Storage topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Surry County adopts battery energy storage zoning rules after public hearing

Surry County Board of Supervisors · April 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Following an applicant-led presentation and public comment focused on safety and noise, the board adopted a zoning text amendment (Ordinance 2025-02) establishing conditional-use standards, setbacks, noise limits and emergency-response requirements for battery energy storage systems.

The Surry County Board of Supervisors adopted a zoning text amendment creating a battery energy storage systems (BESS) use following an applicant-driven drafting process, staff review and a public hearing. Applicant representatives described BESS technology and economic benefits; counsel and staff presented draft ordinance language patterned on the county’s solar ordinance and emphasized required application materials, safety standards and conditional-use permitting.

Key provisions included a base 200-foot setback from property lines (with narrower setbacks allowed adjacent to substations), a 500-foot buffer from occupied structures as a default for sensitive uses, a 20-foot noncombustible area immediately inside the security fence plus a 100-foot vegetative buffer, and noise limits set at 65 dBA at property lines with a 55 dBA limit at the exterior of occupied structures in agricultural districts. The draft also requires application submittals including performance and operations plans, fire-detection and suppression standards referencing the latest NFPA guidance, emergency-response plans satisfactory to county emergency services, noise studies at final site plan and decommissioning/bonding commitments.

Resident public commenters urged caution on emergency response, independent review, noise levels and field visits to operational facilities. Matt Kim, a fire protection engineer, told the board the proposed setbacks and safety measures were conservative relative to NFPA standards and said fielded systems typically use lithium iron phosphate chemistry; he described IP ratings used to protect module enclosures from water intrusion.

The planning commission recommended the ordinance 9–1; after discussion the board voted to adopt the text amendment (Ordinance 2025-02). Board members and staff emphasized that specific projects would return as conditional use permit applications with site-specific conditions addressing noise, emergency access and other operational concerns.

Next steps: ordinance is now on the books; any proposed battery project will require a CUP and final site-plan submittal including noise and emergency-response studies.