Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Youth Programs topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

4‑H numbers rebound as Guadalupe County extension highlights youth programs

Guadalupe County Commissioners Court · December 3, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension reported that 4‑H participation in Guadalupe County returned to and slightly exceeded pre‑pandemic levels, with thousands of students served through school enrichment and hatch‑in‑the‑classroom programs, and volunteers supporting fairs and contests.

Matt Miranda of the Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service told Guadalupe County commissioners that the county’s 4‑H programs have recovered from pandemic declines and, in some categories, surpassed pre‑COVID levels. “This is our first year since the pandemic to come back up to numbers that we had before the pandemic, which is nice,” Miranda said, citing 5,382 youth participating in 4‑H through schools and more than 3,000 children in the hatching‑in‑the‑classroom program.

Two 4‑H ambassadors, Tegan Mayberry and Montana White, addressed the court about leadership and public‑speaking projects, and thanked county leaders for long‑running support. Mayberry, who identified herself as Marion 4‑H club president, said the program helps younger students “know what they can do when they're older and just set a great example.” Commissioners praised volunteers and staff for sustaining the programs: one commissioner recalled watching local 4‑H participants grow into community leaders and said the program is “an incredible investment.”

Miranda noted growth in competitive teams — soil judging, livestock, shooting sports, and several state‑level ambassadors — and pointed to scholarship dollars returned to local students (14 students awarded about $135,000 in state 4‑H scholarships). He closed by inviting ideas for new county extension programs. The county took no formal action; commissioners expressed unanimous thanks and encouraged continued support for extension activities.