Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Trees And Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Builders and residents split on tree rules as council considers Century Code changes
Summary
Public commenters were divided: builders and the Chamber urged approval to increase housing supply and reduce regulatory cost, while arborists and residents urged stronger protections, aftercare, and staffing for tree preservation enforcement.
Several members of the development and business community urged the council to adopt the proposed Century Code updates, saying the package will unlock more housing options and reduce unnecessary regulatory cost.
Scott Rogers of the Eau Claire Area Chamber said the update is a “once in a generation opportunity to align our city policies to encourage the increase in supply and improvements in affordability.” Home builders told the council that the remaining tree‑preservation rules and proposed park impact fees could increase costs that reduce feasibility for small infill projects.
Local forestry professionals and residents supported tree protections but urged practical changes for implementation. Luke Mahal, who said he worked in the city’s forestry department for 8½ years and now owns a local tree‑care company, told the council he supports the amendments but remains worried “they don’t have enough people the way it is to do what they’re doing,” and emphasized the need for planting aftercare and vigilant mitigation tracking. Several speakers asked the council to adopt targeted amendments the following day to reduce immediate burdens on infill development while maintaining canopy goals.
Speakers asked staff for a formal review process to measure long‑term policy impact, and staff said they would prepare forms and an implementation package if the council adopts the ordinance. No final council vote on the LDO was recorded at this meeting.
