Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Instructional Practices topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Presenter emphasizes 'supplement, not supplant' and evidence-based uses of funds
Summary
Speakers highlighted the legal principle that Title I funds must 'supplement, not supplant' state/local funding and described evidence-based interventions (including daily 30-minute small-group instruction) that Title I often pays for.
Get email alerts on the Instructional Practices topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Both speakers stressed that Title I funding is intended to add to, not replace, existing local or state budgets. The Presenter stated, "कानून में इसके लिए ख़ास इसतला है, supplement not सप्प्लांट," and clarified that this means Title I should be used to provide additional services.
The Presenter gave examples of allowable expenditures: small-group instruction, new interventions, teacher training, and tools to monitor student progress. He cited research saying that "छोटे ग्रुपों में रोज़ाना 30 minute की मकसूद हिदायत" can benefit struggling readers more than regular whole-class instruction. No specific program purchases or dollar amounts were announced in the session.

