Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Instructional Practices topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Presenter emphasizes 'supplement, not supplant' and evidence-based uses of funds

CLEAR CREEK ISD · July 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Speakers highlighted the legal principle that Title I funds must 'supplement, not supplant' state/local funding and described evidence-based interventions (including daily 30-minute small-group instruction) that Title I often pays for.

Both speakers stressed that Title I funding is intended to add to, not replace, existing local or state budgets. The Presenter stated, "कानून में इसके लिए ख़ास इसतला है, supplement not सप्प्लांट," and clarified that this means Title I should be used to provide additional services.

The Presenter gave examples of allowable expenditures: small-group instruction, new interventions, teacher training, and tools to monitor student progress. He cited research saying that "छोटे ग्रुपों में रोज़ाना 30 minute की मकसूद हिदायत" can benefit struggling readers more than regular whole-class instruction. No specific program purchases or dollar amounts were announced in the session.