Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Millage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
St. Pete Beach weighs raising millage ceiling to fund resiliency and capital projects
Summary
City staff presented FY27 millage options and a resiliency fund history; commissioners directed staff to publish a higher TRIM ceiling (roughly $3.0M extra levy) and run an extensive community engagement program on how any increase would be spent, with a preference to dedicate 50% of additional revenue to resiliency.
City Finance Director Devin Schmidt presented the commission with the facts behind three statutory millage reference points for FY27 — the rolled‑back rate (3.075 mills), the flat rate (3.0913 mills) and the 0.667 super‑majority cap (3.8330 mills) — and explained that recent revenue growth stems from rising taxable values rather than rate changes. "This growth occurred in a period when the millage rate was flat or slightly lower," Schmidt said, laying out how different choices would affect average homestead and non‑homestead taxpayers.
Multiple residents urged the commission to prioritize infrastructure and fair distribution of tax burdens during public comment. Terry Grocott of the Vina del Mar Island Association asked staff to "reject the recommendation to remove the Bridal Poinciana trees" at a neighborhood park and to revisit park improvement priorities; other speakers pressed for repairs and immediate maintenance at local dog parks.
Commissioners debated whether to hold the rate flat or to publish a higher TRIM notice that would allow public engagement before a September vote. Mayor Tate (presiding) said publishing a higher ceiling preserves the option to lower the millage later but prevents raising it above the published ceiling: "Once the TRIM notice goes out, you can never go higher than that for that fiscal year, but you can go lower." After discussion, the commission gave staff direction to pursue community engagement — including district roadshows and surveys — and to present a draft TRIM filing that would generate roughly $3.0 million in additional levy as a discussion ceiling for outreach (finance director later calculated a tentative equivalent of 3.6715 mills).
Commissioners emphasized transparency, fiscal oversight and the finance committee's role in any spending of additional proceeds. Several commissioners said they support reserving half of any extra levy for the resiliency fund, reflecting a 2022 policy that dedicated 50% of new property tax revenue to sea‑level infrastructure. The commission directed staff to return with implementation details and to continue community outreach in August in advance of the ordinance votes planned for September.
