Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Evaluation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Subcommittee to evaluate trainings and services; members expect at least a year of work

CSEC Subcommittee · July 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The subcommittee discussed Objective 4—evaluating training impact and service outcomes—agreeing that evaluations have largely been done on individual initiative and that a coordinated approach will take time; the chair said most objectives will take at least a year to implement.

The subcommittee discussed Objective 4: evaluating the impact of training and services beyond individual agency initiatives. Members reported evaluations have typically been requested on a case-by-case basis and said central evaluation support could be offered to agencies that request it. The chair and Melody volunteered to evaluate trainings when requested but said evaluating broader service outcomes may be outside the group's immediate expertise.

The chair emphasized the scale of the work: "I think most of these objectives are really gonna take that minimum of year." Members agreed to reach out to stakeholders, gather existing evaluation requests and determine whether the subcommittee can offer evaluation resources or recommend independent evaluation partners. The chair will circulate updates from the UNLV data meeting and other follow-ups ahead of the next meeting.