Get email alerts on the Utilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press council on sewer-rate notice and Prop 218 process
Summary
At public comment residents asked whether the upcoming sewer-rate increase followed Prop 218 mailed-notice rules and urged the city to ensure parcel-owner ballots and timelines comply with state law; staff and council clarified notice procedures and timelines.
Get email alerts on the Utilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents raised procedural questions about a forthcoming sewer-rate meeting and whether Prop 218 protest ballots must be mailed to parcel owners before a rate increase. Mark Bentoncourt (speaker 5) said his letter indicated a rate increase effective Sept. 1 and asked whether property owners would receive mailed ballots; he recounted past practice of parcel notices and a mailed ballot/count process.
Council and staff replied that Prop 218 processes have changed: staff noted recent law changes allow councils to consider protests and that the mailed notices were distributed to 300-foot property owners for the current matter, though some council members expressed concern that not all parcel owners received direct mail. The council agreed to place the sewer-rates item on a future agenda for clarity and further notice.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

