Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Elections topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council refers ranked-choice voting to ballot, approves stagger change contingent on passage and delays implementation to 2029

Longmont City Council · July 25, 2026

Summary

Longmont council voted to refer ranked-choice voting to the ballot using a split-question approach: a referendum on RCV plus a separate stagger/readjustment question conditioned on RCV's passage; council set a 2029 implementation target and emphasized voter education and equipment limitations for multi-winner STV.

After extended public comment and staff briefings, Longmont City Council directed staff to refer ranked-choice voting (RCV) to voters using a split-question approach on July 14. The council specified that the staggered-term question (realigning at-large and ward election cycles) will be listed separately and made contingent on passage of the RCV measure; the implementation date was set for 2029 to allow for voter education and technical preparations.

Staff noted the difference between instant-runoff (single-winner RCV) and single-transferable-vote (STV for multi-winner contests) and warned that multi-winner STV currently requires certified tabulation equipment and Secretary of State rules for multi-jurisdiction contests. Advocates at public comment explained possible representation gains, while opponents raised constitutional and procedural concerns. Councilmembers emphasized clarity in ballot language and recommended substantial voter outreach before any change takes effect. The motion to refer the split approach with the contingency passed 6–1.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source