Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Resilience topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tinmouth planners favor multi-fuel resilience language over electricity-only approach
Summary
Commissioners endorsed resilience language that allows multiple heating and backup sources (wood stoves, propane, generators, small solar/battery systems), arguing that outages and local circumstances make an electricity-only future impractical for Tinmouth.
During review of the enhanced energy plan, Tinmouth commissioners emphasized resilience tailored to local conditions rather than a blanket shift to electricity.
Commissioners repeatedly said multi-fuel approaches reflect town realities: "Energy resilience is the ability to adapt and change and withstand and rapidly recover from disruption," the chair said when discussing resilient systems. Members noted common local practices such as wood stoves and propane backup and argued the plan should preserve those options as legitimate resilience strategies.
Discussion covered small solar systems to power lights and charge batteries during outages, the use of generators at town buildings and technical limitations in some battery systems. Commissioners agreed to keep language that preserves wood heating and other locally practical solutions while they pursue clarifying data from RPC staff.
