Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Meeting Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
VLCT trains Woodstock trustees on open-meeting basics, notice and records requirements
Summary
At a joint April 1 session, a Vermont League of Cities and Towns trainer reviewed what counts as a public meeting, quorum rules, notice and agenda timing, and new recording and minutes requirements for decision-making bodies.
The Woodstock Select Board and Village Trustees held a joint training on Vermont's open meeting law led by a staff attorney from the Vermont League of Cities and Towns. Carly Endier, a staff attorney with the League's Municipal Assistance Center, said the core rule is simple: “you gotta have your meetings open, and noticed,” and only narrow exceptions — such as executive sessions and deliberations tied to quasi-judicial hearings — allow closure of business to the public.
Endier walked the boards through who counts as a public body, how a quorum is calculated (a majority of total membership, not just those present) and when an electronic gathering becomes a meeting. She emphasized practical examples the boards had raised, advising designated single-member email responses to avoid inadvertent serial communications among a quorum. “If a majority of a public body was having a conference call or altogether on Zoom … the open meeting law would still treat that as a meeting,” Endier said.
The trainer also covered administrative obligations: agendas for regular meetings should include sufficient detail and be posted in advance (48 hours for regular meetings, 24 hours for special meetings), minutes must give a true indication of the business and include members present and motions made, and decision-making bodies must record meetings and post the recording for at least 30 days. Endier described the complaint process and remedies, including the need to respond publicly within 10 calendar days to written complaints.
The session was framed as guidance rather than legal counsel on past incidents; the trainer told the assembled boards she would not answer questions that would create liability or amount to specific legal advice. The boards used the session to ask hypotheticals about hybrid meetings, citizen working groups, and how to cure inadvertent posting or minutes errors. The training concluded with staff offering online resources and a municipal inquiry system available to officials for follow-up.
