Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Art topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council sets public hearing on public-arts ordinance, adds criterion to review offensive works
Summary
City council advanced a revised public-arts ordinance (Ordinance 379) and agreed to add a provision allowing the Public Arts Committee and city manager to consider removal if a work "is or has become offensive to a significant portion of the community," with further wording to be finalized before the February public hearing.
Councilors reviewed the proposed Public Arts Ordinance (Ordinance 379) and discussed adding a criterion to allow review or removal of artwork that becomes offensive to the community.
A councilor leading the discussion (speaker 4) described edits by a colleague and recommended setting a public hearing in February. Several councilors debated how to phrase a proposed new subsection so the city could respond if community concerns later arose. One councilor (speaker 7) proposed adding a sixth grounds for removal to capture situations where a significant number of residents found a work offensive.
The city manager (speaker 1) clarified the ordinance language: "So it says the city manager is authorized to remove, from public display a work of public arts taking into consideration the recommendations of the Public Arts Committee." Councilors agreed to add wording that the Public Arts Committee could bring a work back for review if it "is or has become offensive to a significant portion of the community," and a draft of that wording will appear in the document prior to the February public hearing.
Councilors debated how to define "significant portion" and whether removal should be automatic or follow committee review; the council resolved to add the committee-review language and finalize wording before public notice.
