Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Noise topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press for continuous noise monitoring and stricter limits for proposed turbine yard
Summary
During public comment, residents and commissioners asked for tighter noise controls and continuous monitoring if a turbine yard were approved; staff outlined proffered limits (65 dB daytime; 55 dB evening) and a one‑time noise study commitment with annual reporting.
Several public commenters said the application lacked robust, continuous noise monitoring and scientific evidence to protect nearby residents. Mike Fultz and others said turbine intakes and multiple units running together could produce a howling sound not captured by a once‑annual check, and they urged the commission to require continuous monitoring and stronger proffers.
Staff described proffered noise limits—65 decibels during daytime and 55 decibels at night—and a commitment to a noise study following occupancy or upon county request and annual reporting on generation and emissions. Commissioners questioned whether the proffered noise limits exceed county code and whether monitoring cadence should be increased to ensure compliance.
