Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Planning Application Delay topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident urges action after years-long delay on large cemetery project application

Amador County Board of Supervisors · July 29, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the July 28 Board of Supervisors meeting Dave Wardle asked the board to review county rules that allow an applicant to leave a major cemetery project on indefinite hold after failing to fix a narrow gate issue; he requested a future agenda item to consider code or policy changes to terminate unresponsive applications.

Dave Wardle, a local resident, told the Board of Supervisors the community has waited years for resolution on a large cemetery project that moved into Amador County after review in Sacramento County. "The delay...it's been going on 4 years and actually started 10 years ago in Sacramento County," Wardle said, arguing the applicant has repeatedly submitted incomplete packages and, most recently, refused to address a fire-code issue about a narrow gate.

Wardle asked the board to identify the specific county code or policy that lets an applicant remain nonresponsive without a deadline and requested the Board place an agenda item to consider changes so that an unresponsive application could be terminated or returned to the planning commission for a decision. "So my request is specifically for county counsel and/or the planning chairman: what is the code section...that gives an unlimited amount of time to settle a problem that is very simple?" Wardle asked.

The board did not take immediate action on his request during public comment. The item Wardle described is pending in planning; Wardle asked that staff or county counsel provide a written explanation of the relevant code section and that the Board consider amending policy or code to address nonresponsive applicants at a future meeting.