Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Psar Large Cap topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Puget Sound Partnership lays out PSAR large-cap ranked list process; 11 projects invited, $86M requested

Salmon Recovery Council · May 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Puget Sound Partnership staff told the Salmon Recovery Council that 11 large-capital projects were invited to submit final applications, with a combined funding request of $86 million; reviewers will score final applications before a July draft ranked list is produced.

Puget Sound Partnership salmon recovery manager Melissa Speake told the Salmon Recovery Council that the region is advancing 11 large-capital PSAR projects to final submission, with total requests of about $86,000,000. "Since 2007, PSAR has served an important role in salmon recovery...we've had $378,000,000 invested," Speake said, summarizing the program's long-term investments and outcomes.

Speake described the review and ranking process for large-cap projects and the weights reviewers will use: "There are 25 points for salmon benefits, 10 points for habitat quality, 15 points on probability of project success, and 5 points for connection to the action agenda," she said. Staff said reviewers invited 11 projects across eight watersheds; project requests range from about $2,000,000 to $28,600,000.

The presentation also explained how the targeted-investment (TI) program intersects with PSAR: TI funds projects of $1 million to $7 million, and regions may submit up to two TI projects (the partnership may resubmit some previously unfunded projects without counting them against the two-project limit). Staff cited Auburn Narrows and Green River as resubmission examples.

Next steps: final applications are due June 3, followed by virtual sponsor presentations and review-team scoring. Staff expects a draft ranked list on July 1, executive-committee review on July 28, and an SRC review and recommendation on July 30 before leadership-council consideration in August and an anticipated CERF board action in September.