Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Park Renaming topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews draft park‑renaming application; members favor verification and possible fee
Summary
Staff presented a draft renaming application and checklist (developed after the John Ward Park request); the board discussed requiring verification (military service records for veterans), a nominal deposit to deter frivolous applications, fee refunds if council waives the charge, and potential ineligible parks for historic reasons.
Staff presented a draft city code–based application and internal checklist for renaming city facilities and asked the board whether the review process and criteria look sufficient. The materials were developed after a recent John Ward Park renaming request and are intended to apply to parks and other city facilities.
Board members urged verification steps for historical claims, including military service when appropriate. One member suggested adding a checklist item asking applicants for supporting records; staff said military service records are generally obtainable and they could include that request in the application. Several members supported a nominal deposit or administrative fee to offset staff time spent on historical research; staff noted any fee would require city‑council approval and could be refunded if council waives the charge.
The board discussed whether some large or historically significant parks should be off limits to renaming and agreed the code should allow staff and the board to flag such facilities for special consideration. Staff said if the board rejects an application, the applicant may appeal to council.
