Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mariner Farm village rezoning raises parking, sidewalk and open‑space questions
Summary
Staff updated the commission on outstanding items for the Mariner Farm village development — including a requested preliminary plat with lot dimensions, open‑space calculations, ACWA water/sewer letter, and a revised layout that removed rear trails; commissioners debated pedestrian connectivity, parking distribution, and setbacks.
Get email alerts on the Planning Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff presented a list of 11 outstanding items for the Mariner Farm village development application and showed a revised layout in which rear trails had been deleted at the commission’s request. Staff said developers provided a revised layout that includes typical lot minimums (end units 30 feet by 100 feet, interior units 20 by 100) but did not supply the full preliminary plat with dimensions the commission had requested.
Lee Panda, deputy county administrator, explained staff had asked for an open‑space plan with percentages and a preliminary plat showing lot dimensions; developers instead provided notes and typical lot dimensions at the top of the sheet. Panda also noted the developer intends to dedicate a lot to the Greenbackville Volunteer Fire Company and that staff remains neutral on the AFD/water/sewer items until required documentation is submitted.
Commissioners and staff debated pedestrian accommodations and parking trade‑offs. Panda said the road cross section proposes 10‑foot travel lanes and open swales rather than curb and gutter or sidewalks, and that “there’s nothing along the road to indicate a formal path or a formal place for somebody to walk,” which prompted concerns about traffic safety and guest parking for a 140‑unit component. Commissioners noted code requires two off‑street parking spaces per residential unit and that one of those may be a garage under county code; they asked staff to evaluate whether parking distribution and open‑space calculations meet the intent of the village development district.
The commission asked staff to press the applicant for the specific plat and open‑space percentage calculations, and to return with clarifications on parking distribution and whether stormwater ponds should be counted as open space under county practice.
Next steps: staff will request the missing preliminary plat and open‑space documentation and return to the commission with further analysis prior to any recommendation to the Board of Supervisors.
