Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission deadlocks on amendment to require at least one non-rideshare parking space
Summary
A motion to amend the proposed parking ordinance to require at least one non-rideshare parking space failed on a 2–2 tie; commissioners debating business impacts and enforceability left the base ordinance intact.
Commissioner Laura moved to amend the proposed parking ordinance so that rideshare credits could not eliminate all required parking and at least one non-rideshare space would be required; the motion was seconded but failed on a 2–2 tie on June 4.
Laura framed the amendment as a consumer-protection measure: "In no instance shall the 3 rideshare spaces eliminate all of the parking required and at least 1 parking space must be non-rideshare," she said when offering the language. Supporters of leaving the ordinance as drafted argued the market will prevent businesses from removing customer parking and that enforcement is primarily a private/business issue. The commission’s rules require a majority of members present to pass an amendment; the tie meant the amendment did not carry.
Because the main ordinance language remained unchanged, the commission subsequently voted to recommend the base ordinance to council. Commissioners also discussed possible enforcement tools for spillover parking — permit-only residential parking, towing agreements or landlord remedies — but did not add prescriptive vehicle-count minimums in this package.
