Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors split as St. John memorial preserve advances; many voice opposition
Summary
Public comment at the Dublin PZC meeting was heavily attended and dominated by nearby residents opposing the memorial preserve, who raised property-value, traffic, environmental and outreach concerns; supporters, including church members, framed the project as modest and stewardship-minded.
The Planning & Zoning Commission's public-comment period drew a large turnout, and residents expressed strong views on both sides of the Saint John proposal. Multiple nearby homeowners said they were unaware of outreach until homeowners circulated materials and that the large scale of the plan felt inconsistent with the neighborhood.
Opponents raised several recurring concerns: potential property-value decline (citing realtor.com and other studies), environmental risks from burials near Kramer Ditch and the floodplain, increased traffic and funeral processions on narrow Rings Road, and a perceived lack of sufficient notice or outreach. "It is going to impact us economically by devaluing our properties," Javed Iqbal, a Brighton Park resident, told the commission. Several neighbors also invoked a 1990 land-use plan they said envisioned single-family residential for the area.
Supporters told the commission the church had engaged with neighbors, had been a longstanding community institution, and would run a small number of funerals per year. "We have been good neighbors," Rob Braatz, head elder at Saint John, said. Other supporters noted Dublin operates multiple small historic cemeteries within residential areas and that living next to a well-maintained burial ground does not always reduce property values.
Commissioners heard both technical and emotional testimony and said public concerns would inform the final-development review that follows any rezoning approval.
