Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Design Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developers explain zero‑lot‑line option and address concerns about privacy, drainage and spacing
Summary
Cook Development described optional 0‑lot‑line lots (1‑ft setback one side, 9‑ft the other) to enable rear garages and varied home types; commissioners and residents pushed back on potential drainage, maintenance and adjacency impacts and asked for limits on how many 0‑lot lots would be allowed.
Get email alerts on the Design Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cook Development walked commissioners and residents through a 0‑lot‑line option intended to enable narrower lots with rear or detached garages. The developer explained the configuration would not allow two 1‑foot offsets to abut—design controls would ensure an aggregate minimum separation of roughly 10 feet between buildings—and that builders could mix standard and 0‑lot‑line lots across the subdivision.
Residents and commissioners voiced concerns that 0‑lot‑line construction can create drainage and neighbor‑maintenance issues if not carefully managed. One participant said from experience “0 lot line homes make for bad neighbors” and urged clarity on the percentage of lots that could use the 0‑lot‑line treatment; Cook said the developer did not intend a majority of lots to be 0‑lot and that market demand and builder interest would influence the final mix.
