Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Easement Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board grants variance after applicant agrees to remove portion of shed encroaching on Revere sewer easement

Revere Zoning Board of Appeals · July 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The ZBA granted a variance for a storage shed at 620 Revere Beach Boulevard after the applicant agreed to remove roughly 3 feet of the shed to eliminate encroachment into a City of Revere sewer easement and to provide a 3‑foot buffer. The board attached recording and lapse conditions.

The Revere Zoning Board of Appeals approved a variance for a storage shed at 620 Revere Beach Boulevard on July 29, 2026, subject to conditions requiring the appellant to remove approximately 3 feet of the existing shed to eliminate encroachment into a City of Revere sewer easement and to record the variance and plan in the Suffolk County Registry of Deeds.

Attorney Joseph Cattogio, representing the elderly appellant, told the board the applicant could not attend in person and proposed removing the section of the shed that overlapped the easement so the remaining structure could be validated and permitted. “We submitted a proposal to remove approximately 3 feet of the shed, that ends where the encroachment begins,” Cattogio said, adding the cutback would provide “upwards of a 3 foot buffer off of the easement, to allow for any work that needed to be done in that area.” He also said the conservation commission raised water‑displacement concerns and that a water‑mitigation specialist would present to that commission.

The board added standard conditions: the variance rights will lapse if not exercised within two years (with the usual exceptions), the variance must be recorded in the Suffolk County registry of deeds, and the appellant must submit recording details to the city clerk and building inspector. The motion to grant passed on a roll call with four votes in favor and one opposed (Mister Lemina: yes; Mister Lopes: yes; Mister O'Brien: no; Mister Pelton: yes; Chairman Tucker: yes).