Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Board Actions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes and actions at a glance: Shapleigh Planning Board, July 14

Shapleigh Planning Board · July 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Key actions: minutes accepted; Tattlebrook Farm amendment tabled pending amended plans with frontage; Christy Horst hearing scheduled for Aug. 11 with site visit; growth permit paperwork cleared for Map 10 Lot 23; native plantings required; retaining wall conditions accepted; meeting adjourned.

The Shapleigh Planning Board took the following recorded actions on July 14:

- Minutes: The board accepted the prior meeting minutes "as read." (procedural acceptance.)

- Tattlebrook Farm Subdivision (Map 1, Lot 1926): The board tabled the amended subdivision application until the applicant submits amended plans showing road frontage measurements for each new lot; the CEO will verify the frontages before any final sign‑off.

- Christy Horst (conditional home‑business permit, 94 Catois): The board scheduled a site visit and public hearing for Aug. 11 at 6:30 p.m.; staff will verify materials at least seven days prior to the hearing.

- Growth permit (Map 10, Lot 23): The applicant provided previously missing documentation; staff was authorized to finalize administrative sign‑off.

- Landscaping/native species: Board required three juniper and three blueberry plantings to satisfy a revegetation condition; staff will confirm compliance in the field.

- Retaining wall (Jonathan and Tara Raymond): The board voted to accept that the wall conditions had been met following inspection.

- Adjournment: The meeting adjourned by voice vote.

Where available, the meeting record shows motions were made and seconded and votes taken by voice; the transcript does not include a roll‑call vote tally for each motion. For items requiring follow‑up, staff was assigned verification tasks (see individual items above).