Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board orders compliance after dispute over relocated CO2 tank; vendor must pursue permit
Summary
A property manager told the board the CO2 vendor (NewCo) had given conflicting guidance on whether a permit was required after a CO2 tank was moved; the board ordered compliance by Dec. 2 or a $50/day fine.
The board found violations and ordered property owners to be in compliance by Dec. 2, 2026, in a case involving a relocated CO2 bottle and permitting responsibilities.
A property representative said his vendor, NewCo, had given mixed information about permit requirements for moving a tank. “I don’t recommend you do that because it’s not your tank,” the representative quoted city permitting staff as saying; he urged the vendor to pull the necessary permits. The inspector confirmed that moving the tank within the site could require permits and recommended the vendor submit the application.
The board voted to find the violation exists and ordered compliance by Dec. 2, 2026, after which a $50 per day fine would be imposed and recorded if the matter remains unresolved.
