Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Hoa topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors warn covenants and HOA rules are insufficient safeguard; ask for deed restrictions and governing‑body control
Summary
Public commenters told the commission that HOA covenants are not reliable long‑term protections and urged the county to require deed restrictions or covenants that cannot be amended without governing‑body approval, and to avoid imposing special improvement costs on surrounding taxpayers.
Multiple speakers expressed skepticism that Homeowners' Association covenants would protect neighboring property owners long term. "The Homeowners' Association covenants don't equal long‑term protection," said Jana Anderson, who warned that covenants can be amended or dissolved by future homeowners and suggested county‑enforceable deed restrictions instead. Maria Stoppler and others noted draft covenant language giving the declarant (developer) special amendment rights and limiting declarant liability, raising concerns about future control of water and cistern maintenance.
Commissioner Ed Beaudette asked if a waiver of protest for a Special Improvement District could be written as a deed restriction or placed on the face of the plat to alert future buyers; Planning Director Carl Hamming said that could be structured as a plat note or deed restriction enforceable by the county. Residents also objected to the idea that improvements to Jones Lane could be financed through a broader SID that would spread costs beyond the subdivision; speakers said the developer should fund required off‑site improvements and that new taxes on long‑time residents would be unjust. The Commission did not adopt new language at the meeting but staff said they could draft additional conditional language for future consideration.
