Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Allowable Uses topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners seek clarity on whether drones, vehicles and fire trucks qualify under public safety tax language
Summary
Commissioner Weisong asked whether the draft’s use language would treat drones as vehicles and whether wildland fire truck replacements are covered; staff and the chair said the phrasing is intended to be flexible and attorneys will confirm wording before the Aug. 4 second reading.
County commissioners pressed staff July 27 for clarity on what the proposed extension of the public safety sales and use tax would allow the sheriff's office to purchase.
Commissioner Weisong asked whether a drone "is considered a vehicle" under the draft and suggested the term "assets" might avoid unintended exclusions. "I just wanted to raise the question to make sure we weren't being too specific, if a drone isn't considered a vehicle," Weisong said.
The chair responded that the draft’s language — which lists ammunition, fuel and operational supplies and equipment — provides flexibility to cover drones and other equipment. "I would say purchasing fire and emergency services equipment is pretty broad there," the chair said, adding that attorneys and staff can confirm precise terminology before the second reading. Staff also said they researched the language in preparation for the meeting and do not have a different assessment.
Commissioner Applegate separately asked when the sheriff's office typically retires vehicles (mileage or year); staff said they would get that information for the second reading. The question-and-answer exchange did not produce a definitive legal definition during the July 27 session; the board asked staff to follow up with attorneys and bring clarifications to the Aug. 4 meeting.
