Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Voter Access topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill would expand state language-access obligations, lower coverage thresholds
Summary
SB 13 60 would codify Section 203 language-access protections into state law, expand covered languages, lower the numeric threshold for coverage from 10,000 to 5,000 voting-age LEP citizens per county, and create a petition process for undercounted communities; civil-rights groups strongly supported it while county elections officials urged alignment with data-driven, workable standards. Committee passed the bill as amended to appropriations.
Get email alerts on the Voter Access topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The author said SB 13 60 would improve language access for lawfully registered voters who self-identify as limited English proficient by increasing the availability of translated election materials and votable ballots, lowering the numeric coverage threshold from 10,000 to 5,000 voting-age LEP citizens in a county, and establishing a petition process for communities underrepresented in census data.
Julia Gomez of the ACLU of Southern California urged support, calling language access an essential part of the Voting Rights Act and noting the bill would ensure protections remain if federal Section 203 expires. Grama LaSajid of HANA described the bill as restoring dignity and voice for undercounted communities, and multiple civil-rights and labor organizations offered cosponsor or strong support. Kristen Connolly of CACEO (county elections officials) opposed the bill as drafted, urging clearer county-wide standards and alignment with federal thresholds, expressing concern about the practicality and resourcing of expanded requirements.
Committee members acknowledged the trade-offs and voted to pass SB 13 60 as amended and re-refer to Appropriations, while the author committed to continue stakeholder engagement and addressing implementation concerns.
