Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Cameras topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ruston council discusses traffic cameras as safety measure; revenue and cost impacts remain unresolved
Summary
Councilmembers discussed an automated traffic-camera program, with staff saying camera revenue would cover program costs but noting Fircrest lacks capacity to handle increased infractions; Pierce County offered to accept court services if cameras proceed.
Councilmembers discussed the potential deployment of an automated traffic-camera program to address traffic safety and increase enforcement revenue. Councilmember Jensen emphasized that the cameras are intended to improve public safety, not solely to generate revenue, and asked Chief Bautista for offense statistics and further program details. Staff indicated any increase in infractions from cameras would require renegotiation of court-processing terms with the county.
Mayor Hopkins and Councilmember Holland both cautioned that camera implementation must be paired with careful fiscal review; Mayor Hopkins said Pierce County provided a set figure for court processing that staff and the police chief are reviewing. The council did not adopt a camera ordinance or program at this meeting; members asked staff to return with offense data, revenue projections and contract terms before a decision is made.
