Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public surveyors urge changes to proposed subdivision-code certification during Jefferson County hearing
Summary
At a Feb. 9 public hearing, surveyors and residents urged Jefferson County to narrow a proposed requirement that all deeds, plats and records of survey be certified by the Planning Department, arguing it could conflict with state law and strain county staffing.
Jefferson County’s proposed text amendment to Chapter 110 prompted more than an hour of public comment on Feb. 9, with surveyors and residents urging the county to narrow a proposed certification requirement that would require Planning Department sign-off on deeds, survey maps and plats showing land divisions.
Milton Ollerton, Planning & Zoning staff, said the amendment (file AM25-0016) aims to ensure Planning review before documents are recorded so the county does not later discover illegal lot configurations or parcels that fail to meet zoning requirements. "The intent is to prevent situations where recorded surveys result in illegal lot configurations or boundary adjustments without all property owner signatures," Ollerton said.
Several speakers told the commissioners the draft language is overbroad. Shane Reimer read a letter from the Idaho Society of Professional Land Surveyors and said "a record of survey does not convey property" and argued that a blanket certification requirement could conflict with state law; Reimer recommended improving coordination between Planning, the Recorder and surveyors instead of requiring certification on every record of survey. County Surveyor Jeff Rowe said he "supports review of lot splits and boundary line adjustments" but does not believe certification should be required for records of survey and raised concerns about county staffing capacity.
Other commenters echoed those points and suggested collaborative workshops to refine the amendment. Kevin Thompson urged the county to avoid creating confusion for surveys within incorporated cities that have their own planning departments. Commissioners thanked speakers for their input, encouraged continued stakeholder collaboration to develop workable language, and closed the public hearing without taking action.
The Planning Department said staff will continue to work with surveyors and other stakeholders to revise the draft and return with recommended language; related hearings were noted for March and Feb. 18 for other items. No vote or ordinance adoption occurred at the Feb. 9 meeting.
