Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Surveyors urge commissioners not to require planning sign‑off for routine records of survey
Summary
At a public hearing on proposed subdivision-code changes, multiple professional surveyors said requiring planning‑department certification before recording records of survey would conflict with state law and impose delays and costs; planning staff said changes are meant to prevent unvetted recordations that create lots noncompliant with zoning.
Dozens of professional land surveyors told Jefferson County commissioners on Feb. 6 that a proposed ordinance change requiring planning‑department certification for certain recordations would create legal conflicts and burdens for private landowners and surveyors.
Milton, the county planning and zoning administrator, said the draft change is intended to prevent record-of-survey filings that create lots smaller than zoning minimums or that adjust boundaries without notice, causing neighbor disputes and leaving the county to enforce zoning violations. "We just want a little more cooperation," Milton said, explaining staff wants earlier notice of surveys tied to boundary line adjustments or intents to divide land so the county can review zoning compliance before maps are filed.
Surveyors pushed back. Shane Reamer, speaking for the Idaho Society of Professional Land Surveyors, read a letter arguing that "a record of survey in no way transfers property at all" and warned that requiring county certification could put surveyors between conflicting obligations in state law and a local ordinance. Several surveyors suggested alternatives — better education for surveyors and clients, clearer instructions on the planning website, and requiring a copy of any approved boundary-line-adjustment application to accompany a map when it is presented for recording — rather than a blanket certification requirement. Commissioners closed the hearing with no immediate action and told staff to incorporate the public input into a revised draft.
