Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Bridges topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Roosevelt County accepts Bishop Inc. bid for Shotgun Creek (Bridge 1010) and takes earlier bids under advisement

Roosevelt County Board of Commissioners · September 1, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After opening five bids for Bridge 1010, the Roosevelt County Commission accepted Bishop Inc.27s low bid of $496,780.00 for the Shotgun Creek bridge replacement and previously moved all bids under advisement with Interstate Engineering for final review.

The Roosevelt County Board of Commissioners accepted a low bid of $496,780.00 from Bishop Inc. to replace the Shotgun Creek bridge on road 1010. Commissioners Gordon Oelkers, Robert Toavs and Doug Marottek approved the notice of award at the Sept. 16 regular meeting; Commissioner Robert Toavs made the motion and Commissioner Doug Marottek seconded. The Board noted the project will use funds from Senate Bill 536.

The bids had been opened at an earlier meeting on Sept. 2, when five offers were read: Young Guns Construction LLC at $757,325.34; Strata Corporation at $595,862.00 (one disqualification for a missing bid date); Franz Construction Inc. at $520,767.60; Thompson Contracting Inc. at $501,362.59; and Bishop Inc. at $496,780.00. At the Sept. 2 session Commissioner Toavs moved to take the bids under advisement with Interstate Engineering and bring a recommended action to the next regular meeting; that motion passed.

The Board approved the award by motion; no roll-call vote record was provided in the transcript beyond the motion and the note "Passed." The County indicated the replacement will proceed under the identified Senate Bill funding source. Work scheduling, contract execution, and specific construction timelines were not specified in the meeting record.